The effect of Web 2.0 applications on the development of educational communication activities in teaching
Abstract
Communication is an essential task for the educational process, and it is a vital process for all consensus and understanding processes that educators must undertake. The conversation aims are to reach the desired goals of the educational institution. Communication is an interactive social process-based and highly dependent on the sharing of meanings between the sender and the receiver. There is excellent effectiveness of educational technology because of its success in dealing with many instructional problems. This effectiveness is due to its characteristics and advantages, and web 2.0, if properly employed, can solve some - or all - of the issues related to scholarly communication. This study aimed to propose a model in order to activate educational communication activities and teaching in primary schools. The results have shown a remarkable improvement in all aspects of communication activities after employing Web 2.0 applications in these aspects to develop and increase their effectiveness. We hope that this study will contribute to opening a new direction of research concerned with employing new generations of the Web, such as Web 3.0, to create an educational connection that contributes to improving educational outcomes in schools.References
Abebe, L., Bergen, N., & Shifera, A. (2018). Appendix 8 EPHA presentation: application of a qualitative rapid assessment approach to inform community-responsive information, education and communication activities.
Abu Sultan, Y. S., Al Shobaki, M. J., Abu-Naser, S. S., & El Talla, S. A. (2018). The Style of Leadership and Its Role in Determining the Pattern of Administrative Communication in Universities-Islamic University of Gaza as a Model.
Akarowhe, K. (2017). Information communication technology (ICT) in the educational system of the third world countries as a pivotal to meet global best practice in teaching and development. Am J Compt Sci Inform Technol, 5(2).
Alajmi, Q., Al-Sharafi, M. A., & Abuali, A. (2020). Smart learning gateways for Omani HEIs towards educational technology: benefits, challenges and solutions. Int. J. Inform. Technol. Lang. Stud, 4(1), 12-17.
Alkhataba, E. H. A., Abdul-Hamid, S., & Ibrahim, B. (2018). Technology-supported online writing: an overview of six major Web 2.0 tools for collaborative-online writing. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 9.
Blau, I., & Hameiri, M. (2017). Ubiquitous mobile educational data management by teachers, students and parents: Does technology change school-family communication and parental involvement?. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 1231-1247.
Bogdan, R., Pop, N., & Holotescu, C. (2019, January). Using Web 2.0 technologies for teaching technical courses. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2071, No. 1, p. 050003). AIP Publishing LLC.
Caliskan, Semih, Zafer Guney, Regina Sakhieva, Dinara Vasbieva, and Natalia Zaitseva. "Teachers' views on the availability of Web 2.0 tools in education." International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 14, no. 22 (2019): 70-81.
Chaisanit, S. (2018). A REVIEW Of EDUCATIONAL COMMUNICATION MODEL A PRACTICAL TEACHING IN THE THAI CLASSROOM GUIDE. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Thonburi University, 12, 9-18.
Conderman, G. (2019). Notecards: An Effective Study Tool. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 92(3), 85-92.
De Rossi, M., & Zorzi, E. (2019). Dialogue exchanges between children's centers and families: building digital narratives with Digital Storytelling for educational documentation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Family Studies, 24(1).
Faizi, R. (2018). Moroccan Higher Education Students' and Teachers' Perceptions towards Using Web 2.0 Technologies in Language Learning and Teaching. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 10, 86-96.
Ferraro, S. (2018). Is information and communication technology satisfying educational needs at school?. Computers & Education, 122, 194-204.
Ferraro, S. (2018). Is information and communication technology satisfying educational needs at school?. Computers & Education, 122, 194-204.
Garrote, A., Dessemontet, R. S., & Opitz, E. M. (2017). Facilitating the social participation of pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools: A review of school-based interventions. Educational Research Review, 20, 12-23.
Gençtürk, A. T., & Korucu, A. T. (2017). The Effects of Web 2.0 Technologies Usage in Programming Languages Lesson on the Academic Success, Interrogative Learning Skills and Attitudes of Students towards Programming Languages. Higher Education Studies, 7, 114-124.
Hohmann, B. (2019). Integrity Advisors and the Development of Administrative Communication Culture. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(1).
Husam, R., Naser, S. S. A., El Talla, S. A., & Al Shobaki, M. J. (2018). Information Technology Role in Determining Communication Style Prevalent Among Al-Azhar University Administrative Staff.
Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2016). Use of Web 2.0 technologies to enhance learning experiences in alternative school settings. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(4), 272-283.
Krosnick, J. A. (2018). Questionnaire design. In The Palgrave handbook of survey research (pp. 439-455). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Little, D., & Kirwan, D. (2019). Engaging with Linguistic Diversity: A Study of Educational Inclusion in an Irish Primary School. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mkandawire, S. B. (2019). Selected Common Methods and Tools for Data Collection in Research. Selected Readings in Education, 2, 143-153.
Natale, K., & Lubniewski, K. (2018). Use of communication and technology among educational professionals and families. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10, 377-384.
Natale, K., & Lubniewski, K. (2018). Use of communication and technology among educational professionals and families. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10, 377-384.
Niegowski, J. A., & Lafortune, M. A. (2017).Systems and methods for storing and analyzing golf data, including community and individual golf data collection and storage at a central hub. Patent No. 9,661,894. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Ohei, K. N., & Brink, R. (2019). Web 3.0 and web 2.0 technologies in higher educational institute: Methodological concept towards a framework development for adoption. International Journal for Infonomics (IJI), 12, 1841-1853.
Paradis, E., O'Brien, B., Nimmon, L., Bandiera, G., & Martimianakis, M. A. (2016). Design: selection of data collection methods. Journal of graduate medical education, 8(2), 263-264.
Schabenberger, O., & Gotway, C. A. (2017). Statistical methods for spatial data analysis. CRC press.
Sharma, S. A., & Unger, S. (2016). Employing Web 2.0 technologies to support students' academic vocabulary acquisition. Michigan Reading Journal, 48, 17-29.
Sivam, S. P. S. S., Bhat, M. D. J., Natarajan, S., & Chauhan, N. (2018). Analysis of residual stresses, thermal stresses, cutting forces and other output responses of face milling operation on ZE41 Magnesium alloy. Int. J. Modern Manuf. Tech, 10(1), 92-100.
Yuen, A. H., & Hew, T. K. (2018). Information and communication technology in educational policies in the Asian region. Handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, 1-20.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors submitting articles to the IJITLS warrent that the work is original and that she/he is the author of the submission together with the named co-authors; to the extend the submission incorporates text passages, figures, data or other material from the work of others, the submitting author has obtained any necessary permission.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY 4.0).
By submitting an article, the author grants to this journal the non-exclusive right to publish it. The author retains the copyright and the publishing rights for his article without any restrictions.
